Is Super Size Me Convincing? Essay

The doctors were certain that if he did not end the experiment immediately, he would watch establish under iodins skind irreparable damage to his body. Using the rhetorical triangle, we can adorn how the objective utilizes the three points of logos, ethos, and pathos in order to establish a swell founded, credible, and put inive furrow. Without the drug abuse of the rhetorical triangle, trying to create a well founded, credible account of anything would be tight. One could argue that if an argument lacks any part of the rhetorical triangle, the argument is incomplete, and has no credibility or effectiveness.The rhetorical triangle provides the structure the frame of a well mind out and well presented meaningful argument. And by doing so using the rhetorical triangle, on can create a nearly foolproof logical thinking and support for something they believe or support. This is what Spurlock has done here. The message the appeal to ethos the argument, the reason, data, evid ence, and structure. The documentary uses simple, straightforward scientific methods to gather, collect, and analyze the data obtained from the study.Spurlock does this in order to brook the message to people that consume zero point but fast nourishment all of the time is terribly detrimental to your body. Your health suffers, and can until now affect you mentally. Throughout the motion-picture show, he provides a simple structure of the depute at hand, to eat zero but McDonalds all day, both day, for every meal. He does this to show that in no way is feeding fast fare good for you and that it should absolutely be limited if not totally eliminated from your diet. Fast foods have caused or at least helped to cause many Americans problems with obesity and iseases such as diabetes. in that location have been many studies to support these claims and none are unfounded assumptions. The coterminous unit of the rhetorical triangle that the documentary has covered is that of p athos the earshot and the appeals to their emotions, beliefs, values, knowledge and experience. Every American and many of the other peoples of the world have heard of McDonalds. They all know of food, and intimately have had experience with it as well. They know that it tastes good, and is fast and easy. They believe that it is perfectly harmless as well, most of them, anyhow.What they dont know is that it is absolutely terrible for you and causes much more than harm than good. What the movie tries to do is show how the effects of eating so much fast food can harm you. The results can be absolutely horrible, and if left uncorrected could lead to durable damage. The movie tries to use the shock and scare factor of your emotions to get their message across that this squelch is no good. Any intelligent, rational person will take a step back and think twice intimately what they eat and oddly whether or not to eat fast food, even a little.The effect for some people may be nothin g, but others, comparable me will initially completely avoid fast food because of the shock that the movie gave us. Later on, however, after the shock has passed it is no big deal to go back for a burger which can be dangerous. The biggest appeal to fast food it just that it is fast. It is fast, easy, convenient and tasty. Quite appealing. The use of pathos on children is peculiarly prevalent in McDonalds. They target children everywhere, on television, in schools, on signs, and on billboards. Children today cannot avoid them.They use these advertisements almost subliminally, so that the children will entreat and seek out their food. Once they get there, they are overwhelmed with flashy, fun advertise gimmicks. They have happy meals with toys to entice them with, and a playground too. Why wouldnt a child pauperization to go to a place like that? Food, toys, and a playground all in one, it is wonderful. I remember I used to always enjoy going there as a kid. I cannot stand McD onalds now, however, for many it has and will be come a life-long bewilder of company and consumer. This is exactly what McDonalds wants and is what they thrive on, f course they are a business. The last appeal to be covered is that of ethos credibility, authority, appearance and eloquence. Here, as in other aspects there are two sides to the ethos in this documentary. On one side is Spurlock and his doctors and professionals, and on the other side, McDonalds. First off, McDonalds wants you to think that their food is nothing but tasty and filling which it can be. They do not want you to know the harmful and unhealthy aspects of eating there. subsequently all, they want you to come back and spend more moneyWhat Spurlock wants to do with his documentary is get the message out that what we are doing to ourselves by eating this food is hurt us. He wants to expose that what the fast food business is doing is wrong. He does a good job of doing this, as he is very clear about what h e is doing, and how he does it. He uses credible people such as doctors, scientists, and specialists to support his claims and make sure what he tells us is accurate. He does a commodious job of creating a convincing argument one that is difficult to pick apart and find fault within.He has done a great job of providing clear, concise, convincing data. The movie Super Size Me is a great documentary and does a wonderful job of well, documenting the research that Spurlock has done. He put himself through thirty days of hell of eating nothing but McDonalds food in order to show what would guide if that is all you ate nothing but McDonalds food for an undefiled month. The result was shocking and horrifying at the same time. Spurlock gained over 20 pounds of body fat while probably losing quite a galvanic pile of muscle mass and gained nearly twenty percent body fat.After thirty days that is amazing. His health deteriorated to the point that he nearly caused permanent damage to s ome of his vital organs such as his liver. The results were precisely shocking, and they were foolproof as well, everything was done in a way that no one can argue with them and say that well, this was not caused by eating only McDonalds. It was all directly caused by the food. This a very well structured and convincing study and they have done a great job through the documentary of portraying the information to the public.